2 results
59 Objectively-Measured Performance on Tests of Episodic Memory and Executive Function in Autopsy-Confirmed Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
- Madeline Uretsky, Evan Nair, Nicole Saltiel, Bobak Abdolmohammadi, Sydney Mosaheb, Julia Culhane, Brett Martin, Joseph Palmisano, Yorghos Tripodis, Robert Stern, Victor Alvarez, Bertrand Russell Huber, Thor Stein, Ann McKee, Jesse Mez, Michael Alosco
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 264-265
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease that can only be diagnosed at post-mortem. Revised criteria for the clinical syndrome of CTE, known as traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), include impairments in episodic memory and/or executive function as core clinical features. These criteria were informed by retrospective interviews with next-of-kin and the presence and rates of objective impairments in memory and executive functions in CTE are unknown. Here, we characterized antemortem neuropsychological test performance in episodic memory and executive functions among deceased contact sport athletes neuropathologically diagnosed with CTE.
Participants and Methods:The sample included 80 deceased male contact sport athletes from the UNITE brain bank who had autopsy-confirmed CTE (and no other neurodegenerative diseases). Published criteria were used for the autopsy diagnosis of CTE. Neuropsychological test reports (raw scores) were acquired through medical record requests. Raw scores were converted to z-scores using the same age, sex, and education-adjusted normative data. Tests of memory included long delay trials from the Rey Complex Figure, CVLT-II, HVLT-R, RBANS, and BVMT-R. Tests of executive functions included Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B), Controlled Oral Word Association Test, WAIS-III Picture Arrangement, and various WAIS-IV subtests. Not all brain donors had the same tests, and the sample sizes vary across tests, with 33 donors having tests from both domains. Twenty-eight had 1 test in memory and 3 had 2+. Eight had 1 test of executive function and 46 had 2+. A z-score of 1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean was impaired. Interpretation of test performance followed the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology guidelines (Guilmette et al., 2020). Bivariate correlations assessed cumulative p-tau burden (summary semiquantitative ratings of p-tau severity across 11 brain regions) and TMT-B (n=34) and CVLT-II (n=14), the most common tests available.
Results:Of the 80 (mean age= 59.9, SD=18.0 years; 13, 16.3% were Black), 72 played football, 4 played ice hockey, and 4 played other contact sports. Most played at the professional level (57, 71.3%). Mean time between neuropsychological testing and death was 3.9 (SD= 4.5) years. The most common reason for testing was dementia-related (43, 53.8%). Mean z-scores fell in the average psychometric range(mean z= -0.52, SD=1.5, range= -6.0 to 3.0) for executive function and the low average range for memory (mean z= -1.3, SD=1.1, range= -4.0 to 2.0). Eleven (20.4%) had impairment on 1 test and 3 (5.6%) on 2+ tests of executive functions. The most common impairment was on TMT-B (mean z= -1.77, 13 [38.2%] impaired). For memory, 13 (41.9%) had impairment on 1 test. Of the 14 who had CVLT-II, 7 were impaired (mean z= -1.33). Greater p-tau burden was associated with worse performance on CVLT-II (r= -.653, p= .02), but not TMT-B (r= .187, p>.05).
Conclusions:This study provides the first evidence for objectively-measured impairments in executive functions and memory in a sample with known, autopsy-confirmed CTE. Furthermore, p-tau burden corresponded to worse memory test performance. Examination of neuropsychological tests from medical records has limitations but can overcome shortcomings of retrospective informant reports to provide insight into the cognitive profiles associated with CTE.
92 Teleneuropsychological Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Candidates: Cognitive Profiles and Recommendations for Future Practice
- Madeline Uretsky, Hayden Ferguson, Serena Mainiero, Irene Piryatinsky, Maxine Krengel
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 494-495
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Vascular complications, including elevated body mass index (BMI), are known risk factors for cognitive impairment. Obtaining a cognitive baseline is commonplace in pre-surgical protocols, including for Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. Currently, routine evaluations for bariatric surgery candidates do not include neuropsychological assessment. This setting provides a unique opportunity to identify cognitive profiles of younger individuals at risk for cognitive impairment. Here, we argue for the standard implementation of a brief, online cognitive battery via telemedicine, to enhance existing protocols of bariatric pre-surgical evaluations.
Participants and Methods:Nineteen bariatric surgery candidates were referred to a private neuropsychological assessment practice for pre-surgical cognitive/psychological evaluation. Assessments were conducted by a neuropsychologist and a psychology graduate student, via remote video conferencing, between April 2020 and June 2022. Candidates completed a clinical interview, intake form, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A), and were administered a battery of cognitive measures: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R); and select subtests from the TestMyBrain Digital Neuropsychology Toolkit: Trail Making Tests A and B (TMT-A/B), Matrix Reasoning (MR), Digit Span Forward and Backward (DSF, DSB), Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and Simple and Choice Reaction Time (SRT, CRT). Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyze sample demographics. Raw scores on cognitive measures were converted to z-scores and averaged across the sample.
Results:The average age at evaluation was 38.2 (9.6) years and average pre-surgical BMI was 46.6k/m2 (9.3), indicating morbid obesity (BMI>40k/ m2). Ten (52.6%) candidates identified as female, 10 (52.6%) identified as White, 8 (42.1%) had 12 years of education or less, 4 (21.1%) were unemployed, and 9 (47.4%) had comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. BRIEF-A sub-scales were within the average range (T’s= 47.9 - 52.9, SD’s [10.1 - 12.8]). Estimated premorbid IQ was average at 102.7 (11.4). Neuropsychological data revealed group performance within the average range on DSF and DSB (z’s= 0.00), TMT-A (z= -0.16), MR (z= -0.53), CPT (z= -0.39), and HVLT-R False Positives (z= 0.05) and Recognition Discriminability (z= -0.44). SRT (z= -0.70), CRT Accuracy (z= -1.37), TMT-B (z= -0.79), HVLT-R Total Recall and Percent Retained (z’s= -0.88), and Delayed Recall and True Positives (z’s= -1.27) were low average.
Conclusions:In this sample of pre-surgical bariatric candidates with average intelligence, baseline evaluations revealed mild deficits in reaction time accuracy, visual motoric set-shifting, and verbal learning/memory. These deficits may be the result of microvascular changes in the brain secondary to physical compromise. Results provide additional insight into potential early-onset executive dysfunction, psychomotor slowing, and verbal learning/memory difficulties. In addition to these relative areas of neuropsychological weakness, candidates demonstrated relative strengths in attention, working memory, and visuospatial functioning. These insights provide pre-surgical evaluators with additional information to tailor recommendations and treatment approaches that foster surgical success. With a remote, concise, easy-to-administer battery of tests, routine neuropsychological assessment for bariatric surgery candidates is both a feasible and a useful tool for identifying areas of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. Documenting a patients’ cognitive baseline can assist with monitoring long-term vascular risk-factors and potential cognitive impairment.